Public vs Private vs Consortium Blockchains: Use Cases Explained

You likely know that a blockchain is a distributed ledger, but did you know that there is more than one type of blockchain? Just as networks have public and private systems, blockchains come in three main forms: Public, Private, and Consortium blockchains. Their design goals, operating mechanisms, and use cases are completely different. Choosing the wrong blockchain type can be detrimental to your commercial project. This article will clearly analyze the core differences between these three types. We will help you understand which blockchain should be used in which scenario. After reading this guide, you will be able to find the right "chain" for your business.

The Basis for Classifying Blockchain Types

The core of blockchain technology is decentralization and immutability. However, different applications require different degrees of decentralization. Therefore, blockchains are divided into three main types. The core difference between them lies in who can participate and who governs the network. We will start with the most open type and move toward the most private.

Public Blockchains

Public blockchains are the most familiar type of blockchain. Bitcoin and Ethereum are the most famous examples. Public blockchains are completely permissionless. Anyone can join the network at any time, read transaction data, and participate in sending and validating transactions without needing anyone's permission.

This openness gives public blockchains the highest degree of decentralization. Public blockchains typically use complex mechanisms to achieve consensus, ensuring that no single entity can control the network. The biggest advantage of public blockchains is their extremely high level of trust. This is because transaction records are transparent and cannot be altered by anyone. Public blockchains are best suited for building public infrastructure. For example, Bitcoin requires global trust and pseudo-anonymity. Ethereum is the most famous programmable public chain, running a vast number of Decentralized Applications (DApps). However, public blockchains have relatively slow transaction speeds, and fees can fluctuate with network congestion.

Private Blockchains

Private blockchains are entirely permissioned blockchains. They are typically controlled and operated by a single company or organization. A private chain is closed. Only authorized users are allowed to join the network. The organization strictly controls the network's reading, writing, and ledger-keeping permissions.

The greatest advantage of a private chain is its speed and low cost. Because there are few participants and they trust each other, transactions can be confirmed very quickly. Private blockchains have the lowest degree of decentralization. They function more like a centralized database secured by blockchain technology. Private blockchains are best suited for building internal enterprise systems. For example, they can be used for internal corporate data auditing and tracking. They are also suitable for banks or healthcare organizations storing sensitive information, utilizing blockchain's tamper-proof feature while ensuring data is not publicly exposed.

For ordinary users, private blockchains have almost no direct value; they are invisible. However, they can help enterprises increase efficiency. For example, if a manufacturer uses a private chain to record production reports, the probability of product errors decreases. Users ultimately benefit indirectly from faster, more reliable enterprise services. The disadvantages of private blockchains are obvious: they are controlled by a single entity, resulting in low trust. They are completely closed, lacking the core spirit of true blockchain.

Consortium Blockchains

A consortium blockchain is a hybrid between a public and a private blockchain. It is not owned by any single entity; it is jointly governed by multiple collaborating organizations. A consortium chain is semi-permissioned. Nodes participating in ledger validation must receive joint permission from all members within the consortium. However, the data on the network can be public to all members.

For example, several competitors within an industry can collectively maintain a consortium chain. They manage data together, but no single company can control the data unilaterally. Consortium blockchains offer a moderate level of decentralization. They are faster and cheaper than public blockchains, and more decentralized and transparent than private blockchains. Consortium blockchains are best suited for cross-organizational, cross-industry collaboration. Examples include cross-border payments and settlement between multiple banks, or supply chain management where several companies track product origins collaboratively.

R3 Corda is a consortium chain specifically designed for financial institutions. Multiple banks or financial companies form an alliance to jointly validate transactions. Its main users are globally recognized banks, insurance companies, and large enterprises. These institutions require a blockchain with high privacy, compliance, and transaction speed. Many major global banks use Corda technology; for instance, HSBC uses Corda for complex trade finance processes, and J.P. Morgan and Citi explore and use Corda in various financial areas like payments and settlement. These large banks are key members of the R3 consortium.

For ordinary users, a consortium chain means faster services and more transparent processes. For example, if multiple banks use a consortium chain for cross-border payments, your international transfer might become faster and transaction fees lower. The disadvantage of consortium blockchains is that permission is required to join. They are not as completely free as public blockchains, and governance requires consensus among multiple members.

Comparison of Pros and Cons: How to Choose the Right Blockchain?

Selecting the appropriate blockchain type is crucial for a project's success. You must make a decision based on your specific needs. Here is a comparison of the core pros and cons of the three blockchain types:

If you require the highest trust and immutability, choose a Public Chain. Public blockchains are suitable for currency and public applications. If you need to share data among multiple collaborative parties, choose a Consortium Chain. Consortium blockchains are suitable for cross-industry collaboration and supply chain tracking. If you only need a fast, internal, tamper-proof database, choose a Private Chain. Private blockchains are suitable for internal enterprise auditing and data storage.

Visit Bitdeer Learning Hub to Learn More About Blockchain

If you wish to explore more advanced analysis on tokenomics evaluation, or mining economics, we have prepared extensive professional content for you. Welcome to visit the Bitdeer Learning Hub for more professional blog posts on blockchain and crypto to deepen your knowledge base.